I keep revisiting this subject, from time to time. This weekend I was almost convinced I had to buy an ereader. Now I've changed my mind again, after a little bit of research.
Item the first: I really like the Sony reader. It's small, comes in a nice case, and you can get it in red! Red is the best color! But you have to buy books from the Sony store exclusively, or suffer with smallified (un-zoomable) PDF versions of text. Also, there's no internet connection; you plug it into your computer to load it, like my cheap-ass MP3 player. So you can't buy and download a book on impulse.
Item the second: the Kindle is hideous, badly designed with too many buttons, and you have to pay to transfer PDFs onto it. It has internet capability, but an oppressive EULA.
Item the third: $400 for a Kindle, $300 for a Sony reader, and then around $10 for each book.
Here's an excellent article about ebooks and readers and how people think of them at Ars Technica (I got it via Making Light). Essentially, the article's point is that ebooks are inevitable and the resistance people have to them right now is illogical, but that adoption of ebooks is hampered by DRM and confusion about ereaders and downloads (and a lot of other stuff).
Back about (gosh!) a year and a half ago, when I was first thinking of ebooks and wondering what I wanted in one, I said I wanted one that would mimic a book in certain ways--opening up with two screens in the middle (like facing pages) and so forth. I don't think that's necessary now. What I want in an ereader is the ability to download on the fly from anywhere. If I want to buy a book in PDF form directly from a small publisher, I want to be able to do that. If I want to buy a book from Sony's store, or Amazon's Kindle store, I want to be able to do that too and read it. In short, I don't want to have to deal with DRM, or proprietary software crap, or restrictions on internet access. Slap a wifi connection in my reader and let's go!
Oh, and I want to pay about $100 for my reader, and about $5 each for my books. I think that's reasonable. And if this $100 reader and these $5 books perform the way I envision, the ebook/reader market will blossom like a rose garden in June. Someone's going to get filthy rich when they figure it all out. I wish they'd hurry.
7 comments:
I couldn't have said it better. That sounds like what I am holding out for. (I didn't know you couldn't zoom pdf on the kindle. :(
I've been doing the same research, and decided that $100, maybe $150, was my sweet spot for an ebook reader.
I basically decided on the Sony unit, primarily because 1. the kindle is ugly 2. the kindle has wireless but charges a fee to read blogs and 3. the kindle doesn't have native PDF support, and I get a lot of magazines in PDF. Also, I want to be able to publish my own work in some kind of portable format for a reader and not have to pipe it through a DRM'd meatgrinder.
Until that price comes down, though, I'm still waiting.
Jamie--the Sony won't zoom PDFs, I don't know about the Kindle. I didn't look too hard at the Kindle because I'd already heard about all its shortcomings.
Jeremy--I'm really ready to start getting into ebooks in a big way, but there aren't any decent readers out there (at a decent price). I have some ebooks on my desktop and laptop, but I have yet to read them because I don't feel relaxed when I settle down to read on a computer. With an ereader, I could relax the same way I do with a book, I think.
I will always want my dead trees, but I'm all for an ebook reader that basically fits your description. I'd snap one up in an instant, especially to read all the quality PDF mags out there.
Ooh, I hadn't even thought about PDF mags. Really, the only thing standing between us and the perfect ereader is stupidity on the part of manufacturers (who don't seem to know what people actually want in an ereader) and publishers (who don't seem to be able to learn from the mistakes record labels made in the 90s/early 00s).
I'm still resisting.
It's easy to resist something that costs so much, in my case.
Post a Comment